Leu Numismatik AG
Auction 6 23 Oct 2020
View prices realized
► Sale information
Find similar lots
KINGS OF THRACE. Lysimachos, 305-281 BC. Tetradrachm (Silver, 28 mm, 17.12 g, 6 h), struck under Skostokos. Uncertain mint in inland Thrace, circa 285-281 BC. Diademed head of Alexander the Great to right with horn of Ammon over his ear. Rev. ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ - ΛΥΣΙΜΑΧΟΥ / ΣKOΣTOKOY Athena seated left, holding Nike, crowning the king's name, in her right hand and leaning with her left arm on shield decorated with lion's head; in inner left field, cult pillar. Dimitrov, Coinage, group B, O9. Draganov p. 25, 3. Fischer-Bossert, Skostokos, 4c (this coin, V1/R4). Peter p. 218. SNG Copenhagen 1171. Rare. A fresh, very sharp and attractive example of this interesting issue. The reverse slightly double struck, otherwise, good extremely fine.
From the Kleinkunst Collection, ex Leu 95, 25 October 2005, 556 and Rauch 73, 17 May 2004, 221.
The tetradrachms of Skostokos were traditionally assigned to the tumultuous early years after the downfall of Lysimachos and the murder of Seleukos I in 281 BC. However, Fischer-Bossert argued that the unusual appearance of the name Skostokos in the exergue indicates that this dynast, who also struck a small series of bronze coins, may in fact have been a subordinate of Alexander's general rather than one of his successors. Stylistic comparison between Lysimachos' late coinage from Amphipolis and the issues naming Skostokos, with which at least one reverse die also shares a monogram, further reinforces the scholar's arguments. Skostokos may thus have been a local dynast or officer of Thracian or Celtic origin, who perhaps served as Lysimachos' strategos in Thrace while the king was occupied abroad in his wars against Pyrrhos of Epeiros and Seleukos I. If this is true, the tetradrachms of Lysimachos with the name of Skostokos in the exergue were likely struck to pay the local troops that were required to keep Thrace safe from rebellious local tribes and foreign intruders. What happened to Skostokos in the wake of Lysimachos' death in the Battle of Kurupedion and the murder of Seleukos I in Lysimacheia in 281 BC is unclear: if he succeeded in setting up his own realm, it cannot have been for long, as he left no traces in history other than his rare and enigmatic coinage.
From the Kleinkunst Collection, ex Leu 95, 25 October 2005, 556 and Rauch 73, 17 May 2004, 221.
The tetradrachms of Skostokos were traditionally assigned to the tumultuous early years after the downfall of Lysimachos and the murder of Seleukos I in 281 BC. However, Fischer-Bossert argued that the unusual appearance of the name Skostokos in the exergue indicates that this dynast, who also struck a small series of bronze coins, may in fact have been a subordinate of Alexander's general rather than one of his successors. Stylistic comparison between Lysimachos' late coinage from Amphipolis and the issues naming Skostokos, with which at least one reverse die also shares a monogram, further reinforces the scholar's arguments. Skostokos may thus have been a local dynast or officer of Thracian or Celtic origin, who perhaps served as Lysimachos' strategos in Thrace while the king was occupied abroad in his wars against Pyrrhos of Epeiros and Seleukos I. If this is true, the tetradrachms of Lysimachos with the name of Skostokos in the exergue were likely struck to pay the local troops that were required to keep Thrace safe from rebellious local tribes and foreign intruders. What happened to Skostokos in the wake of Lysimachos' death in the Battle of Kurupedion and the murder of Seleukos I in Lysimacheia in 281 BC is unclear: if he succeeded in setting up his own realm, it cannot have been for long, as he left no traces in history other than his rare and enigmatic coinage.