Numismatica Ars Classica
Auction 124 23 Jun 2021
View prices realized
► Sale information
Find similar lots
Cos.
Triple siglos circa 480-475, AR 16.58 g. KΩΣ Naked diskobolos standing facing with his weight on his r. leg, his l. leg crossed behind, while he turns his upper body to his r., about to hurl the discus which he holds above his head; in the background l., a tripod. Rev. Irregular incuse square with diagonal lines, beneath which are visible traces of a crab. Babelon, Traité II, 1738 and pl. CXLVIII, 11. BMC 6. Barron, 'The Fifth-Century Diskoboloi of Kos', Essays Robinson, p. 79, 9 and pl. 9, 9. Kraay-Hirmer pl. 188, 639.
Extremely rare and undoubtedly among the finest specimens known. One of the most
intriguing and fascinating issues of the entire Greek series. Exceptionally
detailed and with a light iridescent tone. Good very fine
Ex New York sale XXVII, 2012, Prospero, 554. Purchased privately in 1987.
Seldom do designs of such contrasting qualities appear on a single coin: the reverse is fixed both in the sense of its formal presentation and its role as a recurring type at Cos, whereas the obverse is original and animated. It portrays an athlete at the moment of releasing a discus – no easy feat for an engraver working in a framework the size of a die. The meaning of the type has attracted many theories. It clearly is an athletic theme, and the tripod of Apollo is such an integral part of the design that it must be assumed to be essential to the meaning of the type. The tripod has thus been seen as a reference to the festival of Apollo at Triopion, where athletes competed for bronze tripods that would be dedicated to Apollo at the local temple. Participation in these games was limited to cities of the Doric Pentapolis: Knidos, Ialysus, Lindos, Kamiros and Cos. Since none of the other four cities produced coins commemorative of this event, it is possible that the type celebrates otherwise undocumented games held in Apollo's honour at Cos. The type was produced over the course of decades, for there is significant evolution in its presentation. The earliest issues – to which this coin belongs – have an abbreviated ethnic and show a crab of varying size in a modified incuse within which an "X" pattern is integrated; in some cases the crab is absent. The next series is transitional in that the inscription starts in its abbreviated form and eventually is expanded to incorporate all five letters; the reverse retains its square incuse, though the field is flat and unadorned except for a prominent beaded border. The final series begins with the longer ethnic and finishes with the original, three-letter version, and the reverse is modified to a circular format with a beaded border. Assigning a date to the series, as Barron notes in his study, is difficult because of a conspicuous lack of hoard or overstrike evidence. Furthermore, much of the discussion centres around the date of the Athenian coinage decree, which Barron had firmly placed in circa 448 B.C., but which is now generally believed to have been passed in the 420s, thus changing a key element in the chronological debate.
Triple siglos circa 480-475, AR 16.58 g. KΩΣ Naked diskobolos standing facing with his weight on his r. leg, his l. leg crossed behind, while he turns his upper body to his r., about to hurl the discus which he holds above his head; in the background l., a tripod. Rev. Irregular incuse square with diagonal lines, beneath which are visible traces of a crab. Babelon, Traité II, 1738 and pl. CXLVIII, 11. BMC 6. Barron, 'The Fifth-Century Diskoboloi of Kos', Essays Robinson, p. 79, 9 and pl. 9, 9. Kraay-Hirmer pl. 188, 639.
Extremely rare and undoubtedly among the finest specimens known. One of the most
intriguing and fascinating issues of the entire Greek series. Exceptionally
detailed and with a light iridescent tone. Good very fine
Ex New York sale XXVII, 2012, Prospero, 554. Purchased privately in 1987.
Seldom do designs of such contrasting qualities appear on a single coin: the reverse is fixed both in the sense of its formal presentation and its role as a recurring type at Cos, whereas the obverse is original and animated. It portrays an athlete at the moment of releasing a discus – no easy feat for an engraver working in a framework the size of a die. The meaning of the type has attracted many theories. It clearly is an athletic theme, and the tripod of Apollo is such an integral part of the design that it must be assumed to be essential to the meaning of the type. The tripod has thus been seen as a reference to the festival of Apollo at Triopion, where athletes competed for bronze tripods that would be dedicated to Apollo at the local temple. Participation in these games was limited to cities of the Doric Pentapolis: Knidos, Ialysus, Lindos, Kamiros and Cos. Since none of the other four cities produced coins commemorative of this event, it is possible that the type celebrates otherwise undocumented games held in Apollo's honour at Cos. The type was produced over the course of decades, for there is significant evolution in its presentation. The earliest issues – to which this coin belongs – have an abbreviated ethnic and show a crab of varying size in a modified incuse within which an "X" pattern is integrated; in some cases the crab is absent. The next series is transitional in that the inscription starts in its abbreviated form and eventually is expanded to incorporate all five letters; the reverse retains its square incuse, though the field is flat and unadorned except for a prominent beaded border. The final series begins with the longer ethnic and finishes with the original, three-letter version, and the reverse is modified to a circular format with a beaded border. Assigning a date to the series, as Barron notes in his study, is difficult because of a conspicuous lack of hoard or overstrike evidence. Furthermore, much of the discussion centres around the date of the Athenian coinage decree, which Barron had firmly placed in circa 448 B.C., but which is now generally believed to have been passed in the 420s, thus changing a key element in the chronological debate.