Classical Numismatic Group, LLC
Electronic Auction 316 4 December 2013
View prices realized
► Sale information
Find similar lots
HUNNIC TRIBES, Hephthalites. Before AD 700. AR Drachm (32mm, 3.25 g, 3h). Imitating a Post-Yazdgerd year 67(?) drachm from the BBA mint. Crowned Sassanian style bust right; c/m: Sogdian legend / Fire altar flanked by attendants; star and crescent flanking flames. Göbl, Dokumente –; CNG 60, 1095 (same rev. die); for c/m: Göbl, Dokumente KM79. VF, lightly toned.
In AH 61, Salm bin Ziyad was appointed Governor of Khurasan by the Umayyad caliph Yazid I. Three years later, bin Ziyad was deposed and replaced by 'Abd Allah bin Khazim. The new governor quickly threw in his lot with the rebel faction led by bin Zubayr, dragging Khurasan into internecine conflict. Meanwhile, the Hepthalites took advantage of Arab distraction and invaded the region. In such a fractured state, Khurasan could not resist the Huns and the whole of the province fell under Hepthalite control for a brief period.
This coin and related imitations (cf. CNG 60, 1090-6 and the following lot) were struck after the deposition of bin Ziyad in the same Khorasanian locality, by the same Sogdian speaking peoples. The group minting these imitations was plainly impartial to whether the prototype was Sasanian (with Khusro II types) or Arab-Sasanian, imitating either 'Abd Allah bin Khazim or Salm bin Ziyad. However, the omnipresence of the tamgha and Sogdian legends (in countermark or engraveur) indicates that an association with Sogdian Hephthalite groups is the most important factor in the coins' identity.
In AH 61, Salm bin Ziyad was appointed Governor of Khurasan by the Umayyad caliph Yazid I. Three years later, bin Ziyad was deposed and replaced by 'Abd Allah bin Khazim. The new governor quickly threw in his lot with the rebel faction led by bin Zubayr, dragging Khurasan into internecine conflict. Meanwhile, the Hepthalites took advantage of Arab distraction and invaded the region. In such a fractured state, Khurasan could not resist the Huns and the whole of the province fell under Hepthalite control for a brief period.
This coin and related imitations (cf. CNG 60, 1090-6 and the following lot) were struck after the deposition of bin Ziyad in the same Khorasanian locality, by the same Sogdian speaking peoples. The group minting these imitations was plainly impartial to whether the prototype was Sasanian (with Khusro II types) or Arab-Sasanian, imitating either 'Abd Allah bin Khazim or Salm bin Ziyad. However, the omnipresence of the tamgha and Sogdian legends (in countermark or engraveur) indicates that an association with Sogdian Hephthalite groups is the most important factor in the coins' identity.